MS-13 suspect returns to us in doubt about Trump’s deportation policy

this Trump administration It announced Friday that it had returned Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an alleged member of the MS-13 – a few months after his deportation to El Salvador, officials later admitted it was an administrative error.

It is unclear whether Abrego Garcia’s return marks a policy shift or is just a one-off. The government combines announcement with news from a new federal indictment, accusing him of committing connections to transporting undocumented U.S. immigration

Nevertheless, the case raises new questions about the government’s willingness to comply with other court orders, whether individuals or entire classes, or requiring some to stay in U.S. detention long enough to challenge the so-called “third country.”

It also weakens the Trump administration’s claim earlier this year that ordering El Salvador to order prisoners or promote return of immigrants sent to El Salvador – a judge has not successfully held the lawsuit in various court lawsuits this year.

So far, this is knowledge about these cases.

100-day injunction, trial and “Teflon don”: Trump’s second term meets his biggest test in court

Daniel Lozano-Camarago

Daniel Lozano-Camarago, formerly known in court documents as “Cristian”, was a 20-year-old Venezuelan immigrant who was deported in March under the Alien Enemies Act, Trump’s 1798 wartime law to quickly relocate it to the highest secret area of ​​Cececot, the country’s highest Cececot.

U.S. District Judge Stephanie Gallagher rule April His deportation violated a settlement agreement that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) stayed with a group of young asylum seekers, including Lozano-Camarago, who entered the country as unaccompanied children and later sought asylum.

Under the agreement, the Department of Homeland Security agreed to be fully sentenced in court until the immigration case was fully ruled, but she said it did not happen in his asylum in the Lozano-Camago case.

Gallagher, appointed by Trump, ruled that his deportation was a breach of contract. In ordering him to return to the United States, she stressed that her ruling had nothing to do with the strength of his asylum request – a tribute to two obvious low-level drug crimes he had approved before his removal – but merely made his asylum claim rule in court with the DHS agreement.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Maintained this decision Later last month, Gallagher set up a formal timetable for the government to promote returns. DHS officials updated the court last week, with Lozano-Camarago still in Cecot.

Trump administration calls for Supreme Court to review El Salvador’s deportation case

‘ocg’

The Trump administration returned a false Guatemalan last week, a native of American soil last week, the first known example Trump administration Comply with the judge’s order and return the individual removed from the United States based on the wrong information.

According to U.S. District Court Judge Brian Murphy, the immigrant was called “OCG” only in court documents and was deported from Mexico in March, but there was no due process, although he expressed concerns about persecution in the country.

Murphy noted that OCG had previously held ransoms and Rape in Mexico But there is no chance to assert these fears before he is removed from office – we and international law have given him this right.

ICE officials told the court earlier this month that they were working to secure his return. Last week, OCG’s lawyers told Fox News that he had returned to the U.S. via commercial flight on Wednesday.

But unlike those who were deported from Cecot, the OCG was not detained in Mexico after being deported, which would have eased some of the obstacles for the government to return to him.

Deportation from third countries

Murphy ordered the Trump administration to detain a group of six U.S. immigrants who were deported to South Sudan without due process or notice until they had the opportunity to conduct so-called “reasonable fear interviews” or have the opportunity to explain to U.S. officials whether any fear of persecution or torture should be released into the South Sudan Islands.

Currently, all six people are still being detained at a U.S. military base in Djibouti (currently the only U.S. military base in Africa), where ICE officials are tasked with citing their detention centers with recent health risks, including malaria exposure, scorching, nearby burn pits and “imminent dangers” to terrorist groups in the terrorist community.

In response, Murphy Reiterate earlier this month Individuals do not have to stay in South Sudan, and the United States is free to move them to another location, including returning to the United States, to perform these procedures more safely. It is not clear whether the government plans to relocate the group.

Who is U.S. Judge James Boasberg at the center of Trump’s deportation efforts?

Chekot prisoner

U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg last week ordered the Trump administration to offer all non-citizens who had expelled from the United States to the highest security prison to the opportunity to seek habeas protection in court and challenge its alleged gang status, the latest in Trump’s alleged struggle centered on the 1798 enduring struggle against Arian’s enemies to expel those who were sent to the Central Committee.

Boasberg reiterated in his 69-page ruling that appropriate procedures include immigrants deported to CECOT’s prior notice of dismissal, as well as so-called habeas protection measures, or the right to challenge their right to dismissal in court. He will submit the Trump administration to court plans until Wednesday to provide habeas protection measures to plaintiffs held at CECOT.

Click here to get the Fox News app

“The defendants explicitly deprived these people of their right to seek habeas protection before they were removed from the United States, which does not itself require evidence of this right through a petition for habeas protection,” Boasberg said in his order.

The order will almost certainly draw backlash from the Trump administration, which has previously opposed Boasberg’s early ruling and a temporary restraining order that fell in March. Boasberg then found that there might be reason to temp look at the court’s announcement on the government’s “intentional disregard” of the March 15 emergency order, which ordered the government to stop deportation under the Alien Enemies Act and immediately return all aircraft to the United States, which did not happen.