NewYou can listen to Fox News articles now!
this Supreme Court Friday is the banner day for the last decision of the High Court term, involving the justices of judicial power and for parents to win in the ongoing cultural war.
The more controversial decisions of the High Court were ideologically. Liberals sometimes condemn bitter condemnations and sometimes oppose them, while the Trump administration celebrates its victory as seen as a landmark.
National ban
In the most eye-catching case of the day, the Supreme Court ended the judge’s approach and issued an exhaustive injunction covering the entire country, not just the parties involved in the case.
SCOTUS rules on Trump’s birthright citizen order, testing lower court powers
President Donald Trump held an executive order after signing the indoor inauguration parade at Capital One Arena in Washington, D.C. on January 20, 2025. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
These bans, often referred to as “national bans”, are the root of frustration President Donald Trump When the judge is with the plaintiff’s party and blocks the key part of the president’s agenda.
The case stems from injunctions issued by several judges that prevent Trump from enforcing his birthright citizenship program. Instead of asking the Supreme Court to uniformly reject the merits of the plan in court, Trump asked the High Court to stop the injunction practice.
The Supreme Court’s 6-3 ruling allows judges and plaintiffs to use other avenues (such as class action) to seek the possibility of broad relief, since both the High Court has cut national injunctions.
Parental rights
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Mahmoud v. Taylor that parents can select their children from the courses in the Maryland public school system and that they have mastered the subjects about homosexuality and transgenderism if they believe the content is inconsistent with their religious beliefs.
Judge Samuel Alito, who wrote for the majority, said: “When parents ask them to submit religious activities to their children, religious activities are an instruction to “a very real threat to undermine the religious beliefs and practices parents want to instill”.”
Supreme Court decides whether to protect parents from LGBTQ books
Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor participated in a panel discussion at the National Forum on Citizens Study Week held at George Washington University in Washington, DC on March 12, 2024 (Jahi Mwandu/The Washington Post via Getty Images)
The Trump administration celebrates the ruling as a victory for “parent rights”, and Justice Sonia Sotomayor said in a harsh objection that the High Court’s ruling would open the floodgates to allow students to opt out of the broader courses.
Clarify the age verification of the website
The Supreme Court allows Texas to perform age verification of users of porn sites and wins for those designed to prevent children from accessing clear materials online.
The trade association of the porn industry filed a lawsuit alleging that the age requirement means the state unconstitutionally regulates freedom of speech on the internet.
“This is a major victory for children, parents and the state’s ability to protect minors from online pornography,” Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a statement. “Companies do not have the right to expose children to pornography and must take reasonable age verification measures.”
The Supreme Court ruled that Texas’s pornography law was constitutional on Friday, June 27, 2025. (AP Photo/J. ScottApplewhite, file)
Voting Rights
The Supreme Court has filed a Louisiana Congress map, indicating that some more questions need to be answered during the fall verbal debate.
The delay means that Louisiana’s voting districts (including most black areas) won’t see any changes until the 2028 election cycle or later.
Click here to get the Fox News app
Now, the Supreme Court will lower it due to its summer break, although some of the spread decisions can still be lowered before the next semester begins in October.
