
NewYou can listen to Fox News articles now!
Sean Diddy CombSeven weeks after Friday, the rapper’s defense team and prosecution completed the end of the debate, and the sex trafficking and blackmail trial ended.
Both sides saw victory and losses throughout the trial, but experts claim Diddy could have “cooked” with a specific charge when the jury was ready to deliberately consider. After being arrested in September 2024, the singer “Last Night” is Accused of sexual traffickingextortion and transportation for prostitution. He pleaded not guilty to all charges.
Former Danity Kane Singer and Diddy Protégé, Aubrey O’Day has been on the trial, not sure what the outcome will be. Although she personally believes the rapper is “indemn guilty of all charges,” the musician is not for sale in court.
Diddy kisses his family after prosecutor promises to stop his alleged crime

A sketch depicts the Sean “Didy” comb of the federal court at the New York City trial in New York City, USA on June 27, 2025. (Jane Rosenberg)
She told her: “What I am doing now is rational and just, the answer should be prosecution, the legally proven answer, which is contradictory to what I personally want.” Extra.
“I don’t know if the prosecution proved (Didi’s crime) without a doubt,” she pointed out.
Didi says not to testify is “completely my decision” and both parties are on trial of sex crimes
In closing the debate, prosecutor argued Didi ran away A fully controlled suspected criminal enterprise. They noted that the jury heard testimony, saw the text, looked at the bank records, and heard the sounds showing the rapper committing crimes decades after the crime. According to the prosecution, the government has shown that Didi has not rejected the answer. To this day Diddy has been able to escape crime because of his money and power, said Christine Slavik, an assistant US attorney. “Stop now.”
Here, experts say each charge represents every charge against Didi and the jury will be considered.
Watch: Defense Attorneys Break the “disturbing” Trend with Diddy Defense Team
Transport for prostitution
Regarding the shipping of prostitution allegations, an expert told Fox News Digital that Diddy could be in trouble.
“Sex workers are very clear about their role and the purpose of traveling across states; it’s for sex and not other things,” explains criminal defense attorney Eric Farddis. “Didy might cook it at that fee.”
However, the defense did find a way to show the jury different explanations to undermine the government’s argument. “The defense had employees of one of the companies say Didi was just buying escorts, not any sexual acts, and the jury could use it as the basis for innocent shipping charges,” said Faddis, founding partner of Varner Faddis, Colorado-based Varner Faddis.
“Didi might cook it at this cost.”

The sketch depicts the Sean “Didy” comb during the New York City trial on June 26, 2025. (Jane Rosenberg)
Blackmail plot
Criminal defense attorney John W. Day told Fox News that it is unlikely that the jury will find Diddy not guilty of extortion.
“What Diddy and his team were able to hope for was a miracle that the jurors didn’t buy the government claimed it was a knock, and Diddy was the head of a criminal empire dedicated to fulfilling his desires,” said the founder of John Day Law. “If jurors have conflicts on racket charges and cannot reach a consensus ruling, it is more likely to win a defensive victory. This could lead to a jury of one or more charges. However, the jurors spent the entire trial, and the entire trial was waiting for Didi’s lawyers to wait for a massive lawsuit and how to reject any case, without resorting to any case, leaving them reluctant to send any witnesses. Whether this lawsuit was sent. Whether any case would be sent. Whether any person would be sent. Whether any person would be sent. Whether any person would be sent. Whether any person would be sent. Whether any person would be sent. Whether any person would be sent. Whether any person would be sent. Whether any person would be sent. Whether any person would be sent. Whether any case would be sent. No, they might be hung or innocent, but unlikely.”
Watch: Prosecutor made a “serious mistake” in Didi’s case, criminal defense lawyer warns
Like what you are reading? Click here for more entertainment news

Sean “Diddy” comb pleaded not guilty to all charges he had. (Getty image of Shareif Ziyadat/Sean “Diddy” comb)
According to legal experts, the prosecution “presented overwhelming evidence” and Diddy “presided the Little Kingdom of criminal activities designed to make him happy – and presented a convincing case to the jury that this fits all elements of rackets, sex trafficking and transportation.”
Day added: “The prosecution can bear some acquittal or jury, but the prosecutor does need a conviction to blackmail.” Again, this can be difficult to convict if the jurors don’t buy the entire commercial empire to engage in sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution theory. However, the defense needs to convince at least one juror that the case does not exist, that the witness is not there, and that the witness lies to lie to save his neck. It was a tough jury, and that was to spend a week of hard work.
Click here to register for entertainment newsletter

Cassie is clearly pregnant with her third child, husband Alex Fine, when she testified. (Jane Rosenberg)
Sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion
Things are Sex trafficking allegationsan expert told Fox News Numbers. Diddy is accused of sexually trafficking his two ex-girlfriends, Cassie Ventura and Jane, who testified under a pseudonym. Prosecutors claimed the rapper transported the two women across the state line and then forced them to have sex with their male escorts while watching.
“During cross-examination, Cassie and Jane acknowledged their willingness to participate in some ‘freaks’, which could lead the jurors to doubt whether all romantic encounters might be agreed,” Faddis noted.
“Both Cassie and Jane acknowledge voluntary drug ingestion before the “freak discount”, which may undermine the coercive argument for prosecution.”
Criminal defense attorneys did point out that both Cassie and Jane made “striking, evocative testimony detailing physical abuse and financial coercion.”

The U.S. Attorney’s Office provided photographic evidence of alleged abuse of Cassie Ventura. (sdny)
Click here to get the Fox News app