The only female death prisoner in OklahomaThe lawyer believes that in the husband’s murder trial, his lawyer is called “gender”. After the ruling of the Supreme Court on Tuesday, he may have another day in court.
Brenda Andrew, 61, was sentenced to death in 2004 Murder her husband who is alienatedRob Andrew.
She was convicted in the 2001 murder, as well as her lover and Sunday school teacher James Pavatt. Pavatt sold a $ 800,000 life insurance policy of Rob Andrew, who acknowledged killing Rob (Rob) with his friends. He denied Brenda’s participation.
Brenda Andrew told the police after the shooting incident that the two masked men were on the arm she was shot. Attack her and her husband According to the court document reviewed by Fox News Digital, he was helping her to ignite the pilot lamp on the garage stove.
Her lawyer believes that the evidence of using her “completely irrelevant sex history” in court is unfair. In court, the prosecutor called her a “slut puppy” and showed her a juror. Thin pants.
Brenda Andrew (Brenda Andrew) in the court in Oklahoma in 2004. (David McDeniel/Oklahoma)
Prosecutors said that thong was a strong evidence of Andrew murdered her husband.
He said: “The sad widow escapes this matter with her boyfriend.” “Guys, you can’t distort the facts. Can’t distort the evidence.”
Andrew packed underwear to Mexico a few days after her husband’s death. Three months after the murder, Andrew and Pavatt exhausted money in February 2002 and re -entered the United States, they were arrested on the border. The two children of Andrew traveled with them and were sent to the grandparents’ detention centers.
Register to obtain Real criminal communication
The Supreme Court Justice wrote in their ruling that the prosecutor “spent a lot of time in the trial” and discussed the details of Andrew’s sexual life. These lives have nothing to do with her Husband’s murder.
“Except for other, the prosecutor has triggered a testimony about Andrew’s sexual partner back to twenty years; about her clothing of dinner or grocery stores; about her underwear for vacation and the frequency of sex in the car, Most people wrote in their decision. Infected test In an unfair way, “make the conviction or judgment generated as” refusing the legitimate procedure “.”
When Bryan Kohberger approaches, Edhata beef shot out of the team
Brenda Andrew (Brenda Andrew) in the left of 2004, and the latest photographer in 2024. (Oklahoma State Correctional Bureau)
However, Clarence Thomas and Neil M. Gorsuch were opposed by Clarence Thomas.
Thomas wrote: “In Andrew’s trial, sex and marriage are inevitable issues. The state has proposed various evidence about her sexual behavior.”
Prosecutors urged the Supreme Court to not hear Andrew’s case in a brief way, arguing that the testimony of her appearance and sexual behavior “but declined in the ocean” is evidence for her. Prior to the ruling of the Supreme Court on Tuesday, the lower court suggested that although the prosecutor’s introduction to the case was inappropriate, the case against Andrew still existed.
Follow the Fox True crime team on X
The Court of 10th Appeals Court of Colorado will now review Andrew’s claims.
Andrew’s lawyer Ed Blau told Koco News 5 This will be determined by the Tenth Tour Court of Appeal to determine the “evidence about (his customer) sexual life” and “evidence about her quality as a mother … should not be awarded the jury, and whether it is promoted to the level to violate her legitimate Program rights “
He said that by the results of the Court of Appeal, Andrew may feel indignant or obtained a new trial. The court can also rule that there is no need to act, and Andrew should stay in the dead prisoner’s cell.
Directly get real -time update Real criminal center
Andrew’s other lawyer Jessica Sutton told theukhohou ask.fm/ She hopes that the court can “prevent this unfair phenomenon.”
She told The Outlet: “Waving these gender metaphors to prove that his belief and punishment for death is unbearable, and pose a threat to everyone who does not follow the strict gender specifications.”
Although she suspects whether the court would commit the crime of murder, Dr. Carole Lieberman, a forensic psychologist, told Fox News Digital that she might be retrial.
Melmann murdered suspects to crime in a bold lunch break.
James Pavatt was taken in 2003 on the left, and on the right is Mugshot in 2024. (Oklahoma State Correctional Bureau)
Lieberman said: “The evidence of her role in the murder case is not enough to sentence the death penalty, so (prosecutor} predatory the jurors ‘stereotypes on the” fallen women’ “and made them despise her.” It is easier than proof to proof. Prejudice … I think this is the hatred of the prosecutor to her, or the improper personal revenge or personal desire to punish her more seriously instead of just life in prison. “
Click here to get Fox News applications
A group of three judges voted 2-1 against Pavatt’s death penalty in June 2017. They determined that Andrew’s husband died too fast because his death was considered “cruel and ingenious”. KFOR reportEssence
According to the Oklahoma Correctional Office, Andrew’s final appeal in 2008 was denied.
