Sarah Murray Recalls the first time she saw an artificial model in fashion: it was 2023, and a beautiful young woman colored denim overall dress. Murray, a business model herself, said it made her sad and ran out.
The iconic Denim company has collaborated with the AI Studio Lalaland.AI to create “various” digital fashion models for more inclusive ads. For an industry that failed for years to hire various human models, the reaction was fast, with a New York magazine calling the decision “Artificial diversity. ”
“Modeling as a profession is already quite difficult without having to compete with now new digital standards of perfection affordable by AI,” Murray told Techcrunch.
Two years later, her concerns worsened. Marks continue to experiment with AI-generated models, to the dismay of many fashionable lovers. The latest turmoil came after the print edition of Vogue presented a guessing ad with a typical model for the brand: thin yet lustful, bright blonde trests, nasty pink lips. She exemplified North American beauty standards, but there was one problem – she was generated.
The internet made a noise for daysMostly because the AI-generated beauty has appeared in fashion, the fashionable Bible, which dictates what is and is not acceptable in the industry. The AI-generated model was presented in an advertisement, no Vogue -editorial has spread. And Vogue told Techcrunch that the announcement had completed its advertising standards.
For many, an announcement against an editorial is a distinction without difference.
Techcrunch spoke to fashion models, experts and technologists to understand where the industry is going now, when Vogue seems to have put a stamp of approval on technology that is ready to drastically change the fashion industry.
Techcrunch -Event
San -Francisco
|
27-29 October 2025
They said the conjecture drama emphasizes questions arising in creative industries affected by AI’s silicon fingers: when high quality creative work can do AI in a fraction of the time and cost, what is people’s point? And in the world of fashion, what happens to people – the models, photographers, stylists and setting up designers – doing those work?
“It’s just a lot cheaper”
Sinead Bovell, model and founder of the Get up an organization that Wrote about CGI Models for Vogue Five years ago, told Techcrunch that “e-commerce models” most threaten automation.
E-commerce models are those that feature advertisements or display clothing and accessories for online shopkeepers. Compared to high-fashion models, whose striking, often inaccessible aspects are presented in editorial spreads and on runways, they are more realistic and known.
“E-commerce is where most models make their bread and butter,” Bovell said. “It’s not necessarily the way to model fame or model prestige, but it’s the way for financial security.”
This fact works in direct contrast to the pressure that many brands feel automating such shoots. Paul Mouginot, an art technologist who worked with luxury brands, said it is simply expensive to work with live models, especially when it comes to photographing them in countless clothing, shoes and accessories.
“AI now allows you to start with a flat-tired product shot, put it on a photorealist virtual model, and even position that model in a coherent layout, producing images that look like authentic fashion editorials,” he told Techcrunch.
Marks, somehow, did so for a while, he said. Mouginot, who is a Frenchman, cited the French merchant Veepee as an example of a company that has used virtual sleeves to sell clothing since at least 2013. Other notable brands like H & m,, Mangoand Calvin Klein also resorted to AI models.
Amy Odell, Fashion writer and author of a newly issued a biography of Gwyneth paltrowPut it simpler: “It’s just so much cheaper for [brands] Use AI models now. Marks need a lot of content, and it just adds. So if they can save money with their print announcement or their Tik -Nutrition, they will do. ”
PJ Pereira, co -founder of AI ad firm Silverside aisaid it really comes to scale. Every conversation he had with fashionable brands about the fact that the entire marketing system was built for a world where brands produced only four large content a year. Social media and web business has changed that, and now they need anywhere from 400 to 400,000 pieces; It’s too expensive for brands, especially small, to continue.
“There is no way to scale from four to 400 or 400,000 with only process retouchs,” he added. “You need a new system. People are angry. They guess it’s about taking money from artists and models. But that’s not what I have seen.”
From “various” models to AI -Avatars
Murray, a business model, understands the expensive benefits of using AI models, but only to some extent.
She lamented that brands as Levi Ai’s claim only intended to complete human talent, not to take away.
“If those [brands] Always had the opportunity to stand in line at an open cast call, they would know about the endless amounts of models, including myself who would dream of opportunities to work with their brands, “she said.” They would never need to complete with something false. ”
She believes that such a change will affect “not traditional”-think, various-commercial models, like herself. That was the main problem with Levi’s announcement. Rather than hiring various talent, it artificially generated it.
Bovell calls this “robot cultural fitness”, or the idea that brands can simply generate certain, especially various identities to tell a brand, even if the person who created technology does not have that same identity.
And although Pereira argues that it is unrealistically shooting every clothing on every kind of model, that has not reassured the fears that many different models have about the coming.
“We already see unprecedented use of certain terms in our contracts, which we care indicate that we eventually sign our rights for a brand to use our face and anything recognizable as ourselves to train their future AI systems,” Murray said.
Some see generating similarities of models as a way forward in the AI -era. Sara ZiffFormer model and founder of the Model Alliance, work to pass the Fashion -workers actWhich would require brands to get a clear consent from a model and give compensation to use their digital replications. Mouginot said this lets models appear at several shoots on the same day and possibly generate additional income.
This is “precious when a searched model is already traveling constantly,” he continued. But at the same time, whenever an avatar is employed, human work is replaced. “What few players earn can mean fewer opportunities for many others.”
If something, Boll said the bar is now higher for models looking to compete with the distinctive and digital. She suggested that models use their platforms to build their personal brands, differentiate themselves and work on new income currents such as podcasting or brand approvals.
“Start taking those opportunities to tell your unique human history,” she said. “AI will never have a unique human story.”
This kind of business mindset becomes tables between industries-from journalism to encoding-because Ai creates the conditions for the most self-directed students.
Room for another view
Mouginot sees a world where some platforms stop working with human models altogether, though he also believes that people share a desire for the “sensitive reality of objects, for a touch of imperfection and for human relationship.”
“Many break models are successful precisely due to distinct feature, teeth, look, attitude, this is a little imperfect by strict standards, yet completely charming,” he said. “Such shades are difficult to erode in zeroes and.”
This is where starting and creative studio Artcare Thrive, according to Sandrine Decorde, the firm’s general manager and co -founder. She calls her team as “AI -Metias”, creative people who use tools as a flow of Black Forest Laboratories To set AI-generated models that have that touch of a unique humanity.
Much of the company of the work Decorde today involves producing AI-generated babies and children for brands. Employment of minors in the fashion industry has historically been a gray area with exploitation and abuse. Ethically, DeCorde argues, bringing generative ai to children’s fashion makes sense, especially when market demand is so high.
“It’s like sewing; it’s very delicate,” she told Techcrunch, alluding to create AI-generated models. “The more time we spend in our databases and image refinements, the better and more consistent are our models.”
Part of the work builds a library of distinct artifacts. DeCorde noted that many AI-generated models-like those created by Seraphinne ValloraThe agency behind Vogue’s guess – is too homogeneous. Their lips are too perfect and symmetrical. Their jaws are all the same.
“Image arts must have an impact,” Decorde said, noting that many fashionable brands like to work exclusively with some models, a desire that poured into AI-generated models. “Model embodies a fashionable brand.”
Pereira added that his company is fighting homogeneity in AI “with intent” and warned that as more content is made by more people who do not intend, all exits go back into computer models, amplifying flexibility.
“As you would play a role for a wide range of models, you have to ask for that,” he said. “You have to train [models] with a wide range of appearances. Because if you do not, the AI will reflect on any bending it has been trained. ”
Ai -‘stone is promised, but uncertain
The use of AI modeling technology in mode is still mostly in its experimental phase, Claudia Wagner, founder of a modeling backup platform Ubooker, told Techcrunch. She and her team saw the guess announcement and said it was interesting technically, but it didn’t work or new.
“It feels like another example of a brand using AI to be part of the current story,” she told Techcrunch. “We are all in a testing and research phase, which AI can add – but the actual value will come when it will be used with purpose, not just for visibility.”
Marks get visibility of using AI – and the guess is the latest example. Pereira said his company recently tested an fully AI-generated product video on Tiktok, which gained over a million views with mostly negative comments.
“But if you look beyond the comments, you see that there is a silent majority – almost 20x engagement – which far exceeds criticism,” he continued. “The click rate was 30X the number of complaints, and the product saw a steep rise in sales.”
He, like Wagner, does not think AI models will leave sometime soon. If anything, the process of using AI will be integrated into the creative workflow.
“Some brands feel good about using fully artificial models,” Pereira said. “Others prefer to start with real people and allow their similarity to build synthetic shoots. And some brands just don’t want to do it – they care that their audiences won’t accept it.”
Wagner said this is obvious is that human talent remains central, especially when authenticity and identity are part of Mark’s story. This applies mainly for brands of luxury heritage, which usually slowly adopt new technologies.
Although DeCorde noted that many high-fashion brands are quietly experimenting with AI, Mouginot said that many are still trying to define their AI policies and avoid fully AI-generated people nowadays. It is one reason that Vogue’s inclusion of AI model was such a shock.
Bonell considered if the announcement was Vogue’s way of testing as the world would react merging high with AI.
So far the reaction has not been great. It is unclear whether the magazine thinks it comes out of the reaction.
“What Vogue is important,” Odell said. “If Vogue ends up doing editorial articles with AI models, I think that will do it well. Like the industry was really immune to Kim Kardashian and then Vogue introduced her. Then it was fine.”
