Can Zepeda force Stevenson to be exciting?


William Zepeda is expected to put uninterrupted pressure on WBC lightweight champion Shakur Stevenson in the battle in Queens, New York on July 12. Stevenson (23-0, 11 kos) is known by fans and media as an overly defensive fighter, adopted Punching holes Ways to win the battle.

Zepeda will illuminate a fire on his back all night, thereby extracting an exciting battle on Zepeda. If Shakur cannot entertain in this game, it is impossible. You have to give up on the native of Newark, New Jersey and see him as a lost career. Stevenson’s running style is so entrenched that even Zepeda can’t make him look exciting.

The little ring won’t stop Shaku from escaping

The battle will be held with a small 18 x 18-foot ring, which will make it difficult for Stevenson to escape Zepeda all night like a battle in the past. But even in the smaller rings, Shakur still has enough room to avoid Mexico’s fist. We all see Stevenson jumping to escape the pressures that Edwin de Los Santos put in the 2023 battle.

Shakur was under a lot of pressure to entertain him instead of running like he usually did, and after Turki Alalshikh issued his instructions, he didn’t want more runners in the Riyadh season. He is a paid warrior like Stevenson, who can perform. So it is understandable why he insists on people like him making it exciting.

If Shakur still chooses to get Zepeda’s fight into track and field by avoiding engagement, he will be booed from the Queens Louis Armstrong Stadium. He will ignore Turki’s instructions to avoid the “Tom and Jerry” fight, showing contempt for him, further undermining the remaining of his brand reduced.

Turki always to 86 Shakur?

If you’re Turki, it’s a good time 86 Shakurput him on the unpopular roster for future Riyadh seasons.

Shakur’s best career victory

-Edwin de Los Santos
– Jamel Herring: 35 years old
-Joet Gonzalez
– Oscar Valdez: After being washed
-Jeremiah Nakathila
– Robson Conceicao
– Artur Harutyunyan: Lost to Frank Martin

Last updated on June 17, 20125



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *