China warns that the use of biometric data through encrypted links is increasing, warning that iris scanning programs running under the guise of digital asset allocations could threaten personal privacy and even national security.
In the announcement publishing On Wednesday, the Chinese Ministry of National Security (MSS) outlined several emerging risks associated with biometric technology, including facial, fingerprint and IRIS data collection.
MSS cites an unidentified overseas company that “scans and collects IRIS information from users around the world under the guise of issuing cryptocurrency tokens and then transfers data sources.” Officials said this poses a “threat to the security of personal information and even national security.”
The reference seems to point to The World of Sam Altmanfamous for collecting iris data in exchange for its World (WLD) tokens. According to its websiteAlthough China is not one of them, the world has operated in 160 countries.
Related: Sacred Research issues unreturned crypto loans using Sam Altman’s World ID
Iris data leakage is irreversible
MSS describes IRIS identification as a high-precision biometric method commonly used in sensitive areas. These features also make it an attractive for abuse. Once damaged, this biometric “bond” is nearly impossible to change.
Facial recognition is also marked as a key issue. “Improper storage of relevant data can lead to leakage, which not only endangers personal privacy and property security, but also poses a threat to national security,” the announcement warns.
Officials cite foreign intelligence agencies cases forged facial data for espionage, including infiltration of critical workplaces.
“While biometrics bring convenience, we should take their safety seriously and be cautious when providing personal biometric information.”
Related: World Chain launches tools to take precedence over robots
Vitalik proposes diversified digital IDs to protect privacy
In June, Vitalik Buterin proposed The new concept is called diversified identityaims to preserve privacy and inclusion in digital identification. Ethereum co-founder expresses concern that even privacy-centric systems will use Zero Knowledge (ZK) It can be risky if a rigid single-person identity model is proven to be enforced.
Buterin warns that the need for a traceable ID may eliminate the pseudonym and expose individuals to government or employer surveillance. He also refuted “proof of wealth” as a fair verification method, believing that it benefits the rich and excludes others.
As a solution, Buterin supports a diversified identity framework where verification comes from multiple sources such as government, social networks or community-driven systems without anyone gaining an advantage.
Magazine: Training AI to secretly love owls or Hitler. meta + ai porn?
