Futurists concerned that we were sliding into AI-fed dystopia, in which the human race acquires its ethical, decisive and intellectual powers to gags of corporate algorithms that do not need more than Ulf Kristersson to justify their fears.
Kristersson, who is by chance the Prime Minister of Sweden, has recently recognized during a Nordic news site that he sometimes asks for Chatgpt about “second opinion” when it comes to his government strategies.
“I use it very often,” Kristersson said During the interview. “If for nothing other than for a second opinion. What did others do? And should we think of the complete opposite? Those kinds of questions.”
Predictably, Kristersson was immediately dragged by his comments. “The more he depends on AI for simple things, the greater the risk of trophy in the system,” Virginia dignum, professor of responsible artificial intelligence at Umeå University, said while chatting With the same exit that interviewed the prime minister. “It’s a slippery slope. We need to demand that reliability can be guaranteed. We didn’t vote for Chatgpt.”
The prime minister was also criticized by various outlets, everyone seemed to feel that Chatbot’s ruling was not the ideal path for Western civilization. “Too bad for Sweden, which AI mostly guesses,” wrote the Signe Krantz of Aftonbladet. “Chatbots would rather write what they think you want than what you need to hear.”
Krantz makes a good point, which is that talk boots can be incredibly simplica and delusional. If you have a leader asking Chatbot -guided questions, you can imagine a scenario, in which the algorithms of the software program are only useful to strengthen that leader’s existing prerogatives (or push them further over the edge into an unquestionable territory). Fortunately, it doesn’t seem like many politicians feel the need to use Chatgpt as a council yet.
Whether Kristersson really relies on a talkboot while navigating his leading duties or whether he was, in reality, just trying to seem a hip calling a popular Te Technic product during an interview, it is clear that AI more and more use all people to output intellectual abilities. This is a dangerous situation to be, as the TE industry industry has already attracted our ability to think for two decades now. How many fools can we all get? I guess we’ll all find out.
