Rigid working models will not survive AI. Here is something



Artificial intelligence, automation and digital connectivity are fundamentally converted how the work is organized. Nevertheless, due to their structure, corporate workplaces have problems.

Loudly, The average lifespan of an S&P 500 company fell from over 65 years in the 1940s to only 15 years. The speed of technological progress is to exceed the adaptability of our work systems, many of which are designed for a slower and predictable era. Companies that once thrive on durability and stability must now include mobility, continuous learning and dynamic work -up models.

Since newly emerging technologies such as AI are developing, the cooperation between people and human-Ai, sustainability and deeper integration of the technology into the workforce is becoming increasingly important. The mandate for managing directors is clear: organizations must go beyond outdated hierarchies and rethink working structures in such a way that they enable both humans and machines.

The industrial revolution slowly moved. This will not

The integration of AI-based technologies already influences the work that people do and how they do. Mustafa Sulyman, the CEO of Microsoft AI, shaped the term “artificial capable intelligence” (ACI), which is the point where AI can solve complex problems without human input. Over the next few years, we will probably see the increase in swarms of AI and several autonomous systems that work together to achieve successful results.

This does not mean that people are outdated, but the role of human supervision shifts from the task execution to resource assignment and strategy. Dan Shipper, CEO from everyway Allocation economyWhat he defines as “how well you can assign and manage the resources to do work.” Instead of simply leading the work, people have to learn to best assign the work on the AI ​​and then to manage and check them. This is a new way of thinking about the work of the majority of employees today.

Unfortunately, it makes the cumbersome way of how today’s companies are structured, it is difficult for them to continuously improve their workforce with technological advances. Organizations are wired for efficiency and scalability, not for learning and adaptability. And the current labor market dynamics only tighten this challenge of AI skills.

A radical new job market

The US labor market is transformed deeply and changes the way we think about work and employment. While employment growth remains stable, there are significant changes in participation and attitudes of the workforce. The participation of the employment population has remained behind the pre-Pandemic level, with millions of adults of an age to work to do not actively participate in the workforce. Many of these people have gone due to false adjustments, lack of training opportunities or changed priorities after pandemic.

In some cases, companies are increasingly confronted with a qualification gap, which are tightened by the number of vacancies that exceed the available talent. In fact, there is currently 9 million job offers In the United States, however, the number of unemployed people looking for work remains much lower, which emphasizes the separation between the needs of the employer and the availability of the workforce.

This shift is further driven by the rise of freelance and contingent work, which quickly becomes a mainstream vocational election. Today, Almost 40% the US workforce is involved in contract or freelance work, a number that is expected 50% until 2050. This trend is particularly pronounced for younger generations, such as gen z, that are increasingly attracted Portfolio Instead of traditional full -time rollers. At the same time, the setting process has become more impersonal, with automation and Ghost trends Leave job seekers frustrated. While companies have difficulty controlling this dynamic, the participation of the workforce is developing, which both employers and employees question and demand a new approach to the acquisition and binding of talents.

Ability-powered guilds as the future of work

If KI’s acceptance accelerates, traditional corporate training programs prove too slowly and incorrectly with real requirements. In the meantime, companies still rely on full -time employment models that today do not support today’s increasingly independent and project -based workforce.

The solution? Skills-controlled guilds (SDGS).

SDGs act as modern, technically capable talent ecosystems that bring employees, companies and educational resources together in specialized communities. In contrast to the traditional attitude, SDGs offer a structured, yet flexible career agent, in which experts continuously contact and combine with new possibilities, while companies use experts talent exactly when they need it.

The recent qualitative research of Upwork with Wikistrat Invited a group of 20 experts to predict how work structures will probably develop by 2030. A consensus area comprised the idea that companies have fewer full -time employees and more freelancers that they hire for certain skills and limited projects. However, the experts admitted that the compilation of these teams will require the development of new talent management systems that are low -ranked, trustworthy and transparent. Since the work becomes more dynamic and project -based, rigid corporate structures do not support employees or companies effectively.

How skill -driven guilds work in practice

A skill -driven guild is like a job market, but with integrated training, trust and continuous commitment. Nowadays, platforms such as Upwork are already acting as proto-SDGs by giving companies access to specialized freelance talents on demand.

Here is what makes SDGS different:

  • Verified, high-quality talent: Employees in SDGS show their expertise through previous projects, AI-controlled reviews and peer reviews-not only traditional degrees or curriculum vitae.
  • Continuous learning and upskill: SDGs offer a structured learning path where experts train together with real work in cooperation with companies or training providers in cooperation with real work.
  • Community-controlled exchange of knowledge: Members have access to mentoring, career resources and industry connections, similar to traditional professional guilds, without being bound to a single employer.
  • Faster setting and reduced friction: Companies immediately match the right experts and integrate them seamlessly into projects, which reduces the time and the costs of setting.

Who pays a guild? Why should companies invest?

The economy of SDGS works differently than traditional employment. Instead of long -term contracts and overhead costs, companies only pay access to curated, highly qualified talents if necessary. Some different models can include:

  • Enterprise-sponsored guilds: Great organizations could finance guilds in exchange for preferred access to top experts in AI, engineering or creative areas.
  • Freelancer-controlled guilds: Independent specialists contribute to a guild for networking, training and employment opportunities, similar to professional associations.

Companies that invest in SDGs not only secure a pipeline of specialists, but also earn a strategic advantage.

Building a workforce with AI designed that thrives

The shift towards flexible, skills that are powered is already underway. Future -oriented organizations take on fractionated leadership roles, the augmentation of the workforce and the talent marketplaces to remain competitive. Those who invest in skills will not only attract the best talent, but also their workforce in the coming decades.

The organizations that thrive will not be those who see skilling as an ongoing journey, not as a unique event. Workers who are continuously adapting and Upskill will lead the next wave of innovation to ensure the economic resilience at a time faster disorder.

The question is no longer If The traditional company will develop, but how quickly Managers are ready to build a ability to build a networked, networked future of work.

The opinions that were expressed in Fortune.com comments are exclusively the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of againstAssets.

This story was originally on Fortune.com



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *