The two initiatives of Trump, which took place on Tuesday evening, seemed to have captured the outline of President Trump to form American power for several hours.
Ten thousand people working around the world for USAID, the main American auxiliary agency, was told to pack up and return home Over the next month, we exclude the initiative of Kennedy-Ere to build alliances by becoming the United States to become the most generous and amazing superpowers in the world. Mr. Trump said that their leaders were “radical lunatics on the left” and the Foreign Ministry ordered them to stop them virtually all their projects, even though it meant cutting off programs that helped eradicate smallpox and prevent millions of HIV cases.
At the same time in the eastern room of the White House, Mr. Trump described a new American enterprise Entertain, occupy and rebuild Gaza into “Riviera in the Middle East”. Two million Palestinians would move there elsewhere – voluntarily or forcibly not clarified. Fifteen -year clearing and rebuilding of destroyed land would begin, said Mr. Trump, the one that the experts imagines, can easily stand multiples of about $ 40 billion that the United States spends on USAID annually on USAID
Mr. Trump then described the future for Gaza, in which it would be re -populated by the citizens of the world, happily living in glass towers with magnificent sea views. There was no discussion of the Palestinians’ Right to return to the territory that he would own and manage the United States. Nor was it discussed whether the move of Palestinians would involuntarily violate the ban on “mass violent transfers”.
Rarely, the confluence of the statement captured so lively that Mr. Trump’s vision for America is the first only selectively insulationist – and is driven by a vision of commercial gain. It is a one -way version of isolationism, defended by high walls at home and protected by American troops on the border to prevent illegal immigrants from preventing. However, the boundaries of other territories must retreat to the US national security or the whims of development.
In this vision, Panama Canal and Greenland must be owned or operated for American interests at first what Mr. Trump’s advisor, Michael Waltz, called Monroe 2.0 last month. But the doctrine only applied to the western hemisphere. Gaza would be an operation outside the area, forcibly inserting US troops abroad-on the difference from what William McKinley, Mr. Trump’s hero made in the Philippines 127 years ago, or what George W. Bush ordered in Iraq a little more than a century later.
Both are now considered to be actions of American colonialism, not if imperialism. And they both caused the rebellion, which led to an American withdrawal.
Mr. Waltz said on Wednesday that Mr. Trump was thinking about his design of the month and that he wanted to force the “region to come up with his own solutions”.
In an interview with CBS, however, he insisted that “he saw no realistic solutions about how these miles and kilometers and kilometers of debris would be clarified, how these essentially unexploded bombs will be removed how these people are physically we will live for at least decades, no if longer ”that will take to restore. Anyone who challenges Mr. Trump’s vision of moving the population does not have a “realistic view” of the despair of people in the “completely non -thereal” belt of land.
Mr. Trump’s view of USAid was born of long-term, often justifiable-that foreign aid programs have been disconnected from American interests of foreign policy, their effectiveness and results often controversial.
And his solution for Gaza sources from his experience as a real estate developer. In his first term, he even had a video made for North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, showing him how hotels and flats could be built along the east coast of the country if it just gave up their nuclear weapons. (Mr. Kim decided to maintain a building weapon-his arsenal is now much larger than Mr. Trump launched his unsuccessful diplomacy with the ground-these beaches still buried mines, rather than a five-star resort.)
But when Mr. Trump made his sales playground, there was no recognition, even fleeting, how the United States should be a sovereign entitlement to Gaza – or why he would like to own the territory and the problem of the rebellion could follow any efforts to force the population. Perhaps it is no surprise: from all accounts the White House did not deserve ideas for testing ideas with its own government experts, organized situational meetings that considered the advantages, disadvantages or even the legality of the idea.
He did not give the allies in the heads-up-dokonce region or Jordan and Egypt, who said he would come to the idea of absorbing Palestinian refugees. There was no effort to combine this idea with its long -term criticism of the American “Forever Wars”.
It was a diplomacy by his pants, the power of his will and his certainty that every beautiful beach deserves the international property of Trump or its equivalent. And it was packed in the explanation that there was no other way to start the process than to evict everyone and bring bulldozers.
“In any city in the United States of America, if you had damage that was after the track of what I saw in Gaza, no one should be allowed to return to their homes,” Steven Witkoff, the Middle East and a colleague developer, said after browsing the region from the air. “That’s dangerous.”
“His buildings could turn over at any time,” he added. “There are no tools, no working water, electric, gas, nothing.” God knows what kind of disease it could celebrate there. So when the President speaks of his cleaning, he speaks of being habitable. ”
There was a little more explanation of USAID’s withdrawal, but it was more of a criticism of what went wrong than a description of the management plans to repair it.
American diplomats have long complained that USAID has grown too remotely from American interests that its programs often worked on an autopilot. Many career diplomats have publicly and privately argued for bringing an independent agency back to the Foreign Ministry, as well as many US allies, as many of the US allies, run assistance from their foreign ministries.
But when Foreign Minister Marco Rubio talked about USAID with interviewer Fox News while visiting El Salvador on Monday, he described the hostility of US-versus-th to those who tried to help. “Basically, they have evolved into an agency that believes it is not even an American government agency,” he said. “They are a global charity organization that they take the taxpayer’s money and spend it as a global charity organization regardless of whether it is in the national interest or not.”
From some embassies he quoted complaints that “USAID not only cooperative; They undermine the work we do in this country. “This is an accurate description of bureaucratic rivals that often take place all over the world, where US embassy employees, military atabé, auxiliary staff and CIA staff can have different priorities. And there is political tension – which has shown, because Mr. Trump has again reduced the use of US foreign aid for any organization around the world that provides abortion or advice in abortion, although these activities are legal in the country.
Mr. Rubio accused that the management of the agency “just thinks it is a global entity and that their master is Globe, not the United States.”
Mr. Trump’s chosen instruments to solve these problems are the Bulldozer in Gaza and the demoral ball of one of the world’s largest government agencies.
“You would rather see us methodically through these programs,” said Michael Singh, CEO of the Washington Institute for the Middle East policy and veteran Bush administration, whose most amazing moment was launched in 2003. Against the spread of AIDS.
“But Trump believes he has to do as quickly as possible as quickly as possible.” Therefore, there is a disruption. So we have to think hard about each of these programs and justify them in terms of American national interest. ”
But he said, “We also have to remember that once you dismantle something, it’s hard to rebuild.”
