NewYou can listen to Fox News articles now!
President Donald Trump will not The New York Times According to the lawyer for Ms. Grey, it reported the U.S. strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities.
Trump has repeatedly convened the New York Times with CNN to report on the U.S. strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities. Tuesday, The Times Posted an article In a leaked intelligence assessment, the strike has only caused Iran to retreat for a few months, Trump administration officials said it was just a false point of conversation aimed at undermining the president. Trump said the attack was completely successful and Iran’s ability was “destroyed”.
Trump also called media reports “very unfair” to the pilots on the mission, and his legal team demanded withdrawal and apology. Personal lawyer president While threatening legal action, the Times report was called “false”, “slanderous” and “unpatriotic”. He also threatened to sue CNN’s report.
David McCraw, the era’s senior vice president who was the newspaper’s main newsroom attorney, shot down any notion of apology or withdrawal.
Trump follows CNN, New York Times is “fake news” about strikes in Iran’s nuclear facility
President Donald Trump held a press conference on June 25, 2025 in the NATO State and Government Summit in The Hague, Netherlands. (Dursun Aydemir/Anadolu via Getty Images)
“No withdrawal is required,” McLeo wrote in a rebellious response to Trump’s lawyer, Alejandro Brito.
McCraw details why the paper relies on its report.
“Let’s be clear about what happened after the attack. U.S. intelligence has released a preliminary assessment and concluded that the attack has only delayed Iran’s nuclear program for a few months. That’s what we’ve reported.”
Trump introduces the country in U.S. ‘Spectacular Military Success’ for Iran’s Nuclear Facility
Trump said on Saturday that the U.S. had conducted a “very successful” strike on Iran’s nuclear site in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan, saying Iran’s nuclear-rich devices had been “eliminated.” (Fox News)
“While the Trump administration protests the assessment is only preliminary, by the way, this is the second word of our article, and later assessments may lead to different conclusions,” he continued. “No one in the administration has questioned what the first assessments said exactly: the damage caused by the raid is not as important as the president’s rhetoric suggests.”
McLeo said Americans should know whether the attack on Iran was successful.
“We rely on intelligence services to provide the impartial assessments that all of us need in a democratic country to judge the quality of our country’s foreign policy and leadership decisions. News agencies are irresponsible to suppress that information and deny the public’s right to listen to it,” McLeo wrote.
Click here for more media and cultural coverage
He added: “We did our best to tell the truth. We will continue to do so.”
Trump recently said CNN and Times were “disgusting, disgusting, very scary people” while opposing reports on the strike. CNN also sticks to its report.
“CNN insisted on our thorough coverage of our early intelligence assessment of the recent strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities, which has since been confirmed by other news agencies. The White House has acknowledged the existence of the assessment and their statements are included in our story,” a CNN spokesman told Fox News on Wednesday.
Click here to get the Fox News app
Rachel Del Guidice and Emma Colton of Fox News Digital contributed to the report.
