The Trump administration’s refusal to pour further daylight on the famous Jeffrey Epstein case, ironically, only served to make everyone pay much more attention to it. As the crisis continues to snow, officials in the government quietly consider at least three different ways of disseminating further information about the dead pedophile and thus remove allegations of cover, reports Axios.
Those Strategies include By appointing special advice that would be tasked with investigating the case and producing a complete report on the matter. Officials also suggested requesting courts to disable any remaining cases of Epstein (the crimes of the dead pedophile occurred in several different states, leaving a trace of criminal cases). Another approach includes non-editing already released EPStein files to share more information with the public. Many of these files were heavily censored.
Unfortunately it doesn’t seem that Trump is very interested in any of these strategies. Axios spoke with numerous Trump officials and external advisers in recent days, many of whom seemed to feel that the government had been halted by the president. “The president said to put this behind us, so we put this behind us,” a top counselor said. “If he changes, then the policy changes. Period.”
“I love Potus, but I think he is delirious about how terrible this looks,” another advisor who doesn’t work in the government, told the exit. Gizmodo has reached the Trump administration for further information.
Over the past week, Trump explained that he is no longer interested in talking about Epstein. During a press event last Tuesday, the frightened president said: “Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? … Are people still talking about this guy, this crawl?” A Fox News Clip Also recently reappeared showing Trump claiming that he may not be interested in releasing further Epstein documents because they may contain “false things.”
You can kindly see why Trump wants the whole thing to go away. The scandal threatened to destabilize the president’s justice, what is reportedly in war with itself over how best to treat the controversy. An alleged feud among the deputy director of the FBI, Dan Bongino, and prosecutor Pam Bondi resulted in a significant internal stress and the appearance of an agency that does not know what it does or who is in charge.
To make things more interesting, Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s ex-girlfriend (who was sentenced to child sex trading In 2021 and sentenced to twenty years in prison), she said she would gladly testify before the congress on the dead financier’s activities. However, many votes on the right expressed skepticism about whether Maxwell would be a reliable source of information. Trump acknowledged that he personally associated with Maxwell and Epstein. When Maxwell was sentenced to prison, Trump just said: “I wish her well.”
Other odd details about the case continue to bubble to the surface. According to Blog post By Judd Legum, a lawyer who briefly represented Epstein before his death later went on to be part of President Trump’s legal defense team during his trials. That lawyer, David Schoen, claimed he could say “authoritatively, no doubt, and no doubt that [that Epstein] Did not have information to hurt President Trump. “How could he be sure?
Meanwhile, even the slow Democrats seized the Epstein affair and began to politicize it to its advantage. A group of House -Democrats is currently trying to force Bondi to release all Epstein documents. Representative Ro Khanna (D-California) said to Axios That he wants to present an amendment to an upcoming cryptocurrency, which would force Bondi to “retain, maintain and compile any records or evidence related to any survey, prosecution or incarceration” by Epstein, before publishing it to a public website.
