With the appointment of Stephen Miran, the Federal Reserve could receive more than one more voices in the drought.
According to the JPMorgan analysts, the intention to change the law on the Federal Reserve Act and reduce the independence of the political decision -makers.
On Thursday, President Donald Trump called MiranThe chairman of the White House Economic Council to fill a vacancy of Adriana Kugler, which had expired before her term in January.
While he is known for a proposal, which was called as an administration, which was called as “Mar-a-Lago Accord” In order to address the US trade deficit, he had another paper in 2024 that he demanded cowred in 2024 Overhaul of the Federal Reserve now becomes more attention.
In a note on Friday, JPMorgan analysts under the direction of the chief economist Bruce Kasman emphasized important suggestions, e.g.
“There is hardly any doubt that the consequence of these reforms is to significantly increase the influence of the president on the US and regulatory politics,” said analysts.
Such changes would require the approval of the congress, and JPmorgan pointed out that it is not clear that such broad changes are available.
However, it is clear that Miran joins the Fed Board – armed by a reform agenda. The FED accused his paper of 2024 to suffer from “Grouthink” and Mission Creep, and argued that changes to the FED would actually contribute to preserving their independence. Jpmorgan doesn’t see it that way.
“The main threat to the independence of the Fed is not politically motivated to change the result of the voices,” said analysts. “Rather, the appointment drives an existential threat, since the administration is expected to aim at the Federal Reserve Act in order to permanently change the US and regulatory authority.”
The White House did not immediately answer a request for a comment.
How the Fed could play defense
The congress has power Change of the authority and mission of the central bank. The Wharton Finance Professor Jeremy Siegel chose this potential in the past month when He said CNBC This powell may have to step down to get the long -term independence of the Fed.
His argument: If the economy stumbles, Trump can point out Powell as the “perfect scapegoat” and ask the congress to give it more power about the Fed.
“This is a threat. Do not forget, our Federal Reserve is not part of our constitution at all. It is a creature of the US congress, which was created by the Federal Reserve Act from 1913. All of its powers withdraw from the congress,” said Siegel. “The Congress has changed the Federal Reserve Act several times. It could do it again. There could be powers. There could be powers away.”
Senator Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, signaled the willingness to change the Federal Reserve Act last week, including interest rates that she pays for bank reserves and your double mandate, even though he believes in the independence of the central bank.
JPMorgan said that the Fed still enjoys support in the Senate, where changes to the law on the Federal Reserve would need 60 votes to overcome a filibuster.
Nevertheless, the FED will also take the threat to its independence seriously and actively protect what “some accommodations” could mean to the requirements of the White House and the Congress, analysts predicted.
“Although dramatic shifts are not expected, the upcoming pressure on the law on the Federal Reserve could be difficult and regulatory decisions in one direction that illuminates the stress,” she said.
A tendency towards monetary loosening would occur in the middle of a relentless pressure of the white house to reduce the rates that have remained unchanged because the Fed officials changed the inflation pressure of Trump’s tariffs from Trump.
Independence is intended to isolate the Fed from such political pressure. But independence is a tricky concept, since it largely releases Michael Pugliese, Senior Economist from a mixture of laws, norms, informal agreements and traditions Wells Fargotold Assets In an earlier interview.
He believes that it is very unlikely that the congress will change the law on the Federal Reserve to enable a more explicit influence from the White House.
This is because the Democrats would not agree and the Republicans would probably not get rid of the Filibuster rule in the Senate in order to undermine the independence of the Fed immediately, he said.
“The promotion of the filibuster would probably open the door for tons and tons and tons of other political discussions on many different topics, not only to the Federal Reserve Act,” said Pugliese. “The filibuster has held up for so long because both parties had reasons and lead to not being changed. And maybe that will change one day, but I would be very surprised if what it has changed would be the Fed.”
Introduction of the 2025 Fortune Global 500The final ranking of the largest companies in the world. Explore this year’s list.
